Welcome

Welcome to the IVP studio. Here is a recap on what was handed out:

The aim of this studio is to develop an iterative design methodology that consists of creating parametric models and evaluating variants generated by these models. You will be required to use advanced digital tools to develop an optimized design proposal that explores the trade-offs between multiple and conflicting evaluation criteria.

The semester will be split into two parts:

·         Elective (AR5953a): “Tools and Techniques for IVP”

o        Week 1 to week 4: Mon, Wed and Thu afternoons
Total 12 afternoons.

o        Week 5: Assignment due, to be completed individually.

·         Studio: (AR4104): “IVP Studio”

o        Week 5 to week 12:  Mon, Wed and Thu afternoons
Total 24 afternoons.

o        Week 13: Final project due, to be completed in groups of three. All the students in the group will get the same grade.

For the elective, you will be introduced to the conceptual framework that is referred to as Iterative Virtual Prototyping. You will learn how to think about design in a new way. Rather than creating one design, you will be creating a digital process that is capable of automatically generating and evaluating large numbers of design variants. The main tool that you will use is called Houdini, developed by Sidefx. This tool is the most advanced procedural modeling tool that exists today, and you will be using it for both design development and design evaluation. You will also be linking to EnergyPlus and Radiance to run simulations of design performance.

For the studio, you will be working in groups of three, and you will sink or swim (or fly) as a group. You will be required to use the Iterative Virtual Prototyping methodology to develop a complex design proposal (site and brief yet to be determined). For the design, you will need to create a digital process that consists of both design development procedures and design evaluation procedures. For development, you need to explore how to parameterize your design ideas so that the right types of variants can be generated, and for evaluation, you need to identify key performance criteria that you would like to use for comparing design variants. At the final crit, you need to present the methodology used to arrive at the final design.